{"id":4667,"date":"2016-02-08T12:03:53","date_gmt":"2016-02-08T12:03:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eo.aei.mpg.de\/en\/?post_type=spotlight&#038;p=4667"},"modified":"2020-04-27T12:04:05","modified_gmt":"2020-04-27T11:04:05","slug":"empty_universes","status":"publish","type":"spotlight","link":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/spotlight\/empty_universes\/","title":{"rendered":"The many ways of building an empty, unchanging universe"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Finding the general laws of nature is only the first step towards a physical description of the world. As a second step, indispensable when it comes to comparing theory with observation, physicists need to find simple models governed by those laws. For instance, in order to test <a title=\"N\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/newtonian-gravity\/\">Newton&#8217;s description of gravity<\/a>, physicists start with a simple set of models &#8211; a small spherical mass orbiting a larger spherical mass under the influence of gravitational attraction, as described by Newton&#8217;s law of gravity. When the larger mass is identified with the sun, the smaller mass with a specific planet, the motion of the spherical masses in the model should approximate the motion of a planet around the sun. Since the physical laws are written in the form of equations, and since a model that obeys these laws must satisfy the relevant equations, such models are commonly called solutions.<\/p>\n<h2>Settling down: Stationary solutions<\/h2>\n<p>Of special interest are so-called stationary solutions. These are solutions whose features do not change over time, for example the gravitational field of a single spherically symmetric star at rest. Such solutions have a great advantage: They are much easier to construct than truly dynamical solutions, in which a system undergoes a complex evolution.<\/p>\n<p>Also, it is to be expected that many systems that do undergo a more complicated evolution will settle down as time passes, and that in the final stages, they will reach a simpler, stationary state. For these reasons, stationary solutions are of great interest to physicists.<\/p>\n<p>This holds true for general relativity as well. Many researchers believe that dynamical, complex solutions of <a title=\"E\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/einsteins-equation\/\">Einste<\/a>i<a title=\"E\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/einsteins-equation\/\">n&#8217;s equations<\/a> &#8211; for instance, a model universe that contains two black holes orbiting and merging, emitting gravitational waves all the while &#8211; will settle down to a simpler, stationary state. (Whether or not this can be shown to be true is a major challenge for mathematical general relativity.)<\/p>\n<p>One interesting question to ask about stationary solutions concerns their variety. Given a set of physical laws (and, possibly, some additional assumptions), how many different kinds of stationary solution are there? Physicists are far from being able to give a complete answer to this question, but even the simplest version of the question &#8211; concerning solutions in which no matter whatsoever is present &#8211; has led to very interesting results.<\/p>\n<h2>How many ways to build an empty, unchanging model universe?<\/h2>\n<p>So how many solutions are there without any matter &#8211; how many ways to build an empty, unchanging model universe?<\/p>\n<p>There is a very similar question in another physical setting, that of electrostatics: for any given configuration of electric <a title=\"C\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/charge\/\">charges<\/a>, the laws of <a title=\"E\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/electrodynamics\/\">electrodynamics<\/a> (called <a title=\"M\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/maxwells-equations\/\">Maxwell&#8217;s equations<\/a>) allow us to find appropriate electric and magnetic <a title=\"F\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/field\/\">fields<\/a> (solutions of these equations). Assume furthermore that we restrict ourselves to solutions with a finite total <a title=\"E\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/energy\/\">energy<\/a> (this excludes, say, the case where all of space is filled with simple <a title=\"E\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/electromagnetic-radiation\/\">electromagnetic waves<\/a>). Now imagine that there are no electric charges present &#8211; the electrostatic version of an empty universe. In that case, there is only one solution, and it is not in any way interesting: Empty space in which the electric and magnetic fields vanish at every point.<\/p>\n<p>Is the situation the same in general relativity? How many different varieties are there of unchanging model universes that are empty of matter?<\/p>\n<p>Actually, the situation is somewhat different. If a given model universe is empty and, as far as we can see, no <a title=\"M\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/matter\/\">matter<\/a> is present, that could mean that there was no matter present from the very beginning. But since we are interested in stationary solutions as end-states of an earlier evolution, we need to take into account another possibility: That matter was present originally, but has since vanished into a black hole. This is nothing that can be excluded a priori &#8211; objects such as <a title=\"E\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/event-horizon\/\">event horizons<\/a> can be formed as the solutions evolve, and stationary black holes are perfectly legitimate end states, for instance of stellar evolution.<\/p>\n<p>One might think that a universe containing a black hole is not empty, but in an important sense, it is just that: The basic equations of general relativity, Einstein&#8217;s equations, tell us how the presence of matter (more precisely, its energy and pressure) <a title=\"C\" href=\"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/explandict\/curvature\/\">curves<\/a> spac-time. From the way that spacetime containing nothing but a single black hole is curved, it is possible to tell that no matter at all is present outside of the black hole&#8217;s event horizon. If a star collapses to form a black hole, all the star&#8217;s matter &#8220;falls over the edge&#8221;, and becomes inaccessible to observations by anyone who stays outside. (It is thought that all matter beyond the horizon will eventually be crushed in a spacetime singularity which forms there, but this is a completely different story, irrelevant for the discussion, because things happening inside the horizon cannot be detected from the outside).<\/p>\n<p>Thus, with the possibility of black holes, the situation is much more interesting in general relativity than in electrostatics. If one assumes that there are no sources of gravity &#8211; just empty space, vacuum containing no matter and no other forms of energy &#8211; and if one explicitly demands that there be no horizons, then the unique stationary solution of the Einstein vacuum equations is Minkowski space-ime &#8211; the flat spacetime of special relativity. But for the less stringent demand that there only be no sources of gravity, the possible presence of a black hole (of a horizon which represents an &#8220;inner boundary of spacetime&#8221;) makes for more variety, corresponding to solutions in which all sources of gravity have disappeared into the black hole.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>More information on one particular answer to the question of how much variety is permitted in general relativity &#8211; how many ways are there of constructing a universe that is completely empty of all matter?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9895,"menu_order":20,"template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[508],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4667","spotlight","type-spotlight","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-spotlights","eo_author-piotr-chrusciel-en","eo_topic-gr","eo_topic-gr-sub07"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/spotlight\/4667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/spotlight"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/spotlight"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/spotlight\/4667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10933,"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/spotlight\/4667\/revisions\/10933"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.einstein-online.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}